|
Row 1 |
All expenditures in the
general fund including instruction, guidance, psychological services,
administration, building maintenance, student transportation, etc |
|
FY 11 proposal represents a decrease of $305,010 from FY10 approved budget (8.5%
decrease) |
|
|
Row 2 |
Expenditures in Row 1
(above) covered by general revenues received |
|
FY11 proposal represents a
decrease of $204,511 from FY10
approved budget (22.0% decrease) |
|
|
Row 3 |
Subtract general revenue
expenditures (row 2) from total budget expenditures (row 1) to get the
expenditures for which property taxes need to be raised. |
|
FY11 proposal represents a
decrease of $100,499 from FY10
approved budget ( 3.8% decrease) |
|
|
Row 4 |
A mathematically created
student count that begins with the actual student count in a school district,
then applies various weights to compensate (equalize) for the additional cost
of educating various categories of students (secondary, low income, English
language learners, etc) |
|
FY11 proposal represents a
decrease of 2.47 equalized pupils from
FY10 approved budget (1.2% decrease) |
|
|
Row 5 |
Divide education spending
(row 3) by equalized pupils (row 4). |
|
FY 11 proposal represents a decrease of $342.95 from
FY10 approved budget (decrease of 2.6%) |
|
|
Base Education Amount |
State legislature fixed
this amount for FY11 in the 2009 legislative session |
|
FY11 amount is the same as
in FY10 |
|
|
Row 6 |
Divide the district's ed
spending per eq pupil (row 5) by the base education amount - this is a
measure of the district's spending in relation to a common state-wide base
spending amount |
|
FY11 proposal represents a
decrease of 4.014 from FY10 approved
budget (2.6% decrease) |
|
|
Base Tax Rate |
State tax commissioner
makes a recommendation on December 1 each year, based on the financial status
of the state's Education Fund |
|
FY11 base tax rate
represents an increase of 2 cents per $100 of homestead value over FY10 rate |
|
|
Row 7 |
Multiply district spending
adjustment (row 6) by base tax rate, |
|
FY11 rate represents a
decrease of 0.45 cents per $100 of
homestead value from FY10 rate (0.34% decrease)) |
|
|
Row 8 |
This figure relates the appraised value of
properties in Cabot with their actual selling price. |
|
This year's CLA is up 1.17
points from last year's, a 1.2% increase overall |
|
|
Row 9 |
Divide equalized homestead
tax rate (row 7) by CLA (row 8), to compensate for a district's property
valuation "up-to-dateness" relative to other districts in the state |
|
FY11 rate represents a
decrease of 2.2 cents per $100 of
homestead value over FY10 rate (1.6% decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
Special Revenue Funds
(Title I, IDEA-B, Substance Abuse Program, etc) are not included in the tax
impact worksheet bcause they have no impact on the tax rate. |
|
|
Revenues in the Special
Revenue Funds equal expenditures in those Funds, and canot be
used to pay for any expenditures in the General Revenue Fund. are not included in the tax impact worksheet bcause they
have no impact on the tax rate. |
|
